Effect of Hospital Characteristics on Performance of Pediatric Digit Replantation in the United States.

Introduction Utilize a national pediatric database to assess whether hospital characteristics such as location, teaching status, ownership, or size impact the performance of pediatric digit replantation following traumatic digit amputation in the United States. Materials and Methods The Kid's Inpatient Database (KID) was used to query pediatric traumatic digit amputations between 2000 and 2012. Ownership (private and public), teaching status (teaching and non-teaching), location (urban and rural), hospital type (general and children's), and size (large and small-medium) characteristics were evaluated. Replantations were then divided into those that required subsequent revision replantation or amputation. Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regressions were performed with p <0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Overall, 1,015 pediatric patients were included for the digit replantation cohort. Hospitals that were privately owned, general, large, urban, or teaching had a significantly greater number of replantations than small-medium, rural, non-teaching, public, or children's hospitals. Privately owned (odds ratio [OR]: 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.06-3.06; p = 0.03) and urban (OR: 2.29; 95% CI: 1.41-3.73; p = 0.005) hospitals were significantly more likely to perform replantation. Urban (OR: 4.02; 95% CI: 1.90-8.47; p = 0.0003) and teaching (OR: 2.11; 95% CI: 1.17-3.83; p = 0.014) hospitals were significantly more likely to perform a revision procedure following primary replantation. Conclusion Private and urban hospitals were significantly more likely to perform replantation, but urban and teaching hospitals carried a greater number of revision procedures following replantation. Despite risk of requiring revision, the treatment of pediatric digit amputations in private, urban, and teaching centers provide the greatest likelihood for an attempt at replantation in the pediatric population. The study shows Level of Evidence III.

Four-Corner Arthrodesis versus Proximal Row Carpectomy: Risk Factors and Complications Associated with Prolonged Postoperative Opioid Use.

Introduction This article compares opioid use patterns following four-corner arthrodesis (FCA) and proximal row carpectomy (PRC) and identifies risk factors and complications associated with prolonged opioid consumption. Materials and Methods The PearlDiver Research Program was used to identify patients undergoing primary FCA (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 25820, 25825) or PRC (CPT 25215) from 2007 to 2017. Patient demographics, comorbidities, perioperative opioid use, and postoperative complications were assessed. Opioids were identified through generic drug codes while complications were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revisions, Clinical Modification codes. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results A total of 888 patients underwent FCA and 835 underwent PRC. Three months postoperatively, more FCA patients (18.0%) continued to use opioids than PRC patients (14.7%) ( p = 0.033). Preoperative opioid use was the strongest risk factor for prolonged opioid use for both FCA (odds ratio [OR]: 4.91; p < 0.001) and PRC (OR: 6.33; p < 0.001). Prolonged opioid use was associated with an increased risk of implant complications (OR: 4.96; p < 0.001) and conversion to total wrist arthrodesis (OR: 3.55; p < 0.001) following FCA. Conclusion Prolonged postoperative opioid use is more frequent in patients undergoing FCA than PRC. Understanding the prevalence, risk factors, and complications associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use after these procedures may help physicians counsel patients and implement opioid minimization strategies preoperatively.

Implicit and Explicit Factors That Influence Surgeons' Decision-Making for Distal Radius Fractures in Older Patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors that influence surgeons' decision-making in the treatment of distal radius fractures in older patients. METHODS: Fourteen clinical vignettes of a 72-year-old patient with a distal radius fracture were sent to 185 orthopedic hand and/or trauma surgeons. The surgeons were surveyed regarding the demographic/practice details, treatment decision (surgical or nonsurgical), and factors that influenced management, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, functional status, radiographic appearance, and handedness. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the effect of both surgeon-described (explicit) and given clinical (implicit) factors on the treatment decision and to evaluate for discrepancies. RESULTS: Sixty-six surgeons completed the survey, and 7 surgeons completed 10-13 vignettes. Surgeons made the explicit determination to pursue nonsurgical treatment based on the presence of comorbidities (odds ratio [OR], 0.02 for surgery; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.01-0.05), but the observation of the underlying clinical data suggested that the recommendation for surgical treatment was instead based on a higher functional status (OR, 3.54/increase in functional status; 95% CI, 2.52-4.98). Those employed by hospitals/health systems were significantly less likely to recommend surgery than those in private practice (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79) CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that the presence of comorbidities, functional status, and practice setting has a significant impact on a surgeon's decision to treat distal radius fractures in older patients. The discrepancy between the surgeon-described factors and underlying clinical data demonstrates cognitive bias. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Surgeons should be aware of cognitive biases in clinical reasoning and should work through consequential patient decisions using an analytical framework that attempts to reconcile all available clinical data.

Charges for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Are Affected by Fracture Pattern, Location of Service, and Anesthesia Type.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize charges associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures and identify sources of variation contributing to overall cost. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2009-2017. Outpatient claims were identified using the International Classification of Diseases-9/10-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for distal radius fixation surgery. A multivariable mixed model regression was performed to identify variables contributing to total charges of the claim, including patient demographics, anesthesia method, surgery location (ambulatory surgery center [ASC] versus a hospital outpatient department [HOPD], operation time, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and billed procedure codes. RESULTS: A total of 9029 claims were included, finding older age, private primary insurance, surgery performed in a HOPD, and use of local anesthesia (vs general or regional) associated with increased total charges. There was no difference between gender, race, or ethnicity. Additionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), increased operative time/fracture complexity, and use of perioperative medications contributed significantly to overall costs. CONCLUSIONS: Charges for distal radius fracture surgery performed in a HOPD were 28.3% higher than compared to an ASC, and cases with local anesthesia had higher billed claims compared to regional or general anesthesia. Furthermore, charges for percutaneous fixation were 54.6% lower than ORIF of extraarticular fracture, and claims had substantial geographic variation. These findings may be used by providers and payers to help improve value of distal radius fracture care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Implant Charge Differences Between Distal Radius Fixation Constructs (CPT 25607, 25608, and 25609).

BACKGROUND: Implants are a significant contributor to health care costs. We hypothesized that extra-articular fracture patterns would have a lower implant charge than intra-articular fractures and aimed to determine risk factors for increased cost. METHODS: In total, 163 patients undergoing outpatient distal radius fracture fixation at 2 hospitals were retrospectively reviewed stratified by Current Procedural Terminology codes. Implants and associated charges were noted, as were sex, age, insurance status, surgeon specialty, and location. Bivariate and multivariable regression were used to determine associations. RESULTS: Total implant charges were significantly lower for 25607 (extraarticular, $3,348) than 25608 (2-part intraarticular, $3,859) and 25609 (3+ part intraarticular, $3,991). In addition, intra-articular fractures had higher charges for distal screws/pegs and bone graft. Charge was lower when surgery was performed at a trauma center. There was no charge difference associated with insurance status, age, sex, hand surgery specialty, or fellow status. Substantial intersurgeon variation existed in all fracture types. CONCLUSION: Distal radius fractures may represent a good model for examining implant costs. Extra-articular fractures had lower implant charges than intra-articular fractures. These data may be used to help construct pricing for distal radius fracture bundles and potential cost savings.

Unanticipated Admission Following Outpatient Ligament Reconstruction and Tendon Interposition: An Analysis of 3966 Cases.

Background: Hand surgeons in the United States commonly perform ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) to address debilitating thumb carpometacarpal arthritis. The objective of this investigation was to examine the characteristics that place patients at risk for unanticipated inpatient admission after a planned outpatient LRTI. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) datasets from years 2009 to 2016 were used to identify patients with a primary Current Procedural Terminology code for LRTI (25445, 25447). Only outpatient, nonemergent, and elective procedures were considered. Univariable and multivariable regression were used to determine risk factors and postoperative complications associated with increased likelihood of unanticipated admission, defined as length of initial hospital stay greater than 0 days. Statistical significance was set at P < .05. Results: Of 3966 patients who underwent outpatient LRTI, 134 (3.4%) had unplanned admission. On multivariable regression, age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.50), white race (OR = 4.44), and chronic steroid use (OR = 2.42) were significant predictors of unplanned admission. History of smoking, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, and anesthesia method were not associated with admission. Patients who had unplanned admission had increased rate of reoperation (2.5% vs 0.3%) compared with nonadmitted patients. There was no difference in rate of postoperative infection, deep vein thrombosis, wound dehiscence, or 30-day mortality. Conclusions: Age ≥ 65 years, chronic steroid use, and white race were significant predictors of unplanned admission following LRTI. Identifying patients with these characteristics will be critical in risk adjusting the anticipated cost of the episode of care in outpatient LRTI.

A Simple Initiative to Decrease Time to Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Open Fractures Is Durable After 2 Years.

INTRODUCTION: A simple antibiotic prophylaxis initiative can effectively decrease the time to antibiotic administration for patients with open fractures. We aim to determine whether adherence to the protocol decreased over time without active input from the orthopaedic trauma team. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients with open fractures (excluding hand) presenting directly to the emergency department at one Level I trauma center. Three separate 50-patient groups were included: a preimplementation cohort, immediately postimplementation cohort, and a retention cohort 2 years later. The primary outcome was time from emergency department presentation to antibiotic administration, and secondary outcomes were the percentage of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 minutes and incidence of infection requiring revision surgery within 90 days. The χ2 and Student t-tests evaluated between-group differences, and multivariable linear or logistic regression evaluated risk factors. RESULTS: After implementation, the time from presentation to antibiotic administration decreased markedly from 123.1 to 35.7 minutes and remained durable (50.0 minutes) at retention. The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics within 60 minutes increased markedly from 46% preimplementation to 82% postintervention and remained similar at retention (80%). The postintervention and retention groups were markedly more likely to receive antibiotics within 60 minutes than the preintervention group (odds ratio [OR], 8.4 and 4.7, respectively), as were patients with a higher Gustilo-Anderson type (OR, 2.4/unit increase), lower extremity injury (OR, 2.8), and male sex (OR, 3.1); mechanism, age, and Injury Severity Score were not associated. No difference was observed in infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our educational initiative showed durable results in reducing the time from presentation to antibiotic administration after 2 years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III.

Seasonal Trends in Traumatic Digit Amputations: Experience of a Level І and a Level ІІ Hospital in a Northeastern State.

Background: Traumatic digit amputations are common hand injuries in the United States. The primary aim of our study was to describe the relationship between season and mechanisms of amputation. Methods: The Emergency Department and Orthopaedic Surgery Billing Department databases of our level І institution in the Northeast were reviewed to identify patients with a traumatic digit amputation between January 2010 and December 2015. Inclusion criteria were defined as any patient presenting with a partial or complete amputation through Verdan zone I or II. All patient information was entered into a secure database, including date of injury, demographic information, digits amputated, mechanism of injury (crush, laceration, avulsion, bite, blast, saw, snow blower, or lawn mower), and Verdan zones of amputation. In addition to descriptive statistics, Fisher exact and χ2 tests were used to compare the incidence of these traumatic digit amputation mechanisms between seasons. Results: For this 6-year period, an average of 24 patients presented each season for treatment of a traumatic digit amputation. Of all seasons, spring had the highest proportion of lawn mower amputations (62.5%; P < .0001), summer had the highest proportion of blast amputations (75.0%; P = .011), and winter had the highest proportion of snow blower amputations (90.9%; P < .0001). All other traumatic digit amputation mechanisms had no significant seasonal variation in incidence (P > .30). Conclusions: Given that certain traumatic digit amputation mechanisms occur predictably during certain seasons, seasonal public education has the potential to prevent these debilitating injuries.

Pediatric Digit Replantation Following Traumatic Amputation: Nationwide Analysis of Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Cost.

Background: Indications for replantation following traumatic digit amputations are more liberal in the pediatric population than in adults, but delineation of patient selection within pediatrics and their outcomes have yet to be elucidated. This study uses a national pediatric database to evaluate patient characteristics and injury patterns involved in replantation and their outcomes. Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kid's Inpatient Database was queried for traumatic amputations of the thumb and finger from 2000 to 2012. Participants were separated into those who underwent replantation and those who underwent amputation. Patients undergoing replantation were further divided into those requiring revision amputation and/or microvascular revision. Patient age, sex, insurance, digit(s) affected, charges, length of stay, and complications were extracted for each patient. Results: Traumatic digit amputations occurred in 3090 patients, with 1950 (63.1%) undergoing revision amputation and 1140 (36.9%) undergoing replantation. Younger patients, those with thumb injuries, females, and those covered under private insurance were significantly more likely to undergo replantation. Cost, length of stay, and in-hospital complications were significantly greater in replantation patients than in those who had undergone amputation. Following replantation, 237 patients (20.8%) underwent revision amputation and 209 (18.3%) underwent vascular revision, after which 58 required revision amputation. Risk of revision following replantation involved older patients, males, and procedures done recently. Conclusions: Pediatric patients who underwent replantation were significantly younger, female, had thumb injuries, and were covered by private insurance. Our findings demonstrate that in addition to injury factors, demographics play a significant role in the decision for finger replantation and its outcomes.

Mortality and Morbidity of Surgical Management of Geriatric Ankle Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of geriatric ankle fractures is rising. With the substantial variation in the physiologic and functional status within this age group, our null hypothesis was that mortality and complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) between patients who are aged 65 to 79 are equivalent to ORIF in patients who are aged 80 to 89. METHODS: Patients with ankle fracture were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Patients treated with ORIF were identified using the Current Procedural Terminology codes. Patients were divided into two age cohorts: 65 to 79 years of age and 80 to 89 years of age. The primary outcome studied was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission, revision surgery, surgical site infection, sepsis, wound dehiscence, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, blood transfusion, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, stroke, myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency or failure, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: Our cohort included 2,353 ankle fractures: 1,877 were among 65 to 79 years of age and 476 were among 80 or older. Thirty-day mortality was 3.2-fold higher in the 80 to 89 years of age group compared with the 65 to 79 years of age group (1.47% versus 0.48%, P = 0.019). However, after controlling for the ASA class, 80 to 89 years of age patients no longer had a significantly higher mortality (P = 0.0647). Similarly, revision surgery rate (3.36% versus 1.81%, P = 0.036), transfusion requirement (2.94% versus 1.49%, P = 0.033), urinary tract infection (1.89% versus 0.75%, P = 0.023), and hospital length of stay (4.9 versus 2.9 days, P < 0.0001) were all significantly higher in the 80 to 90 years of age group compared with the 65 to 79 years old group. However, after controlling for the ASA class, 80 to 89 years old patients no longer had a rate of complications in comparison to the 65 to 79 years old age group. DISCUSSION: After controlling for comorbidities (ie, the ASA class), no increased risk is observed for the 30-day mortality or complication rate between geriatric ankle fracture in the 65 to 79 years old and the 80 to 99 years old age groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic level III, retrospective study.

Cost-Effectiveness of Initial Revision Digit Amputation Performed in the Emergency Department Versus the Operating Room.

Background: The objective of this study was to determine the comparative cost-effectiveness of performing initial revision finger amputation in the emergency department (ED) versus in the operating room (OR) accounting for need for unplanned secondary revision in the OR. Methods: We retrospectively examined patients presenting to the ED with traumatic finger and thumb amputations from January 2010 to December 2015. Only those treated with primarily revision amputation were included. Following initial management, the need for unplanned reoperation was assessed and associated with setting of initial management. A sensitivity analysis was used to determine the cost-effectiveness threshold for initial management in the ED versus the OR. Results: Five hundred thirty-seven patients had 677 fingertip amputations, of whom 91 digits were initially primarily revised in the OR, and 586 digits were primarily revised in the ED. Following initial revision, 91 digits required unplanned secondary revision. The unplanned secondary revision rates were similar between settings: 13.7% digits from the ED and 12.1% of digits from the OR (P = .57). When accounting for direct costs, an incidence of unplanned revision above 77.0% after initial revision fingertip amputation in the ED would make initial revision fingertip amputation in the OR cost-effective. Therefore, based on the unplanned secondary revision rate, initial management in the ED is more cost-effective than in the OR. Conclusions: There is no significant difference in the incidence of unplanned/secondary revision of fingertip amputation rate after the initial procedure was performed in the ED versus the OR.

Fluoroscopy as Definitive Postreduction Imaging of Pediatric Wrist and Forearm Fractures Is Safe and Saves Time.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies indicate that formal postreduction radiographs may be unnecessary for closed, isolated pediatric wrist, and forearm when mini C-arm fluoroscopy is used for reduction. Our institution changed the Emergency Department (ED) management protocol to reflect this by allowing orthopaedic providers to determine if fluoroscopy was acceptable to assess fracture reduction. We hypothesized that using fluoroscopy as definitive postreduction imaging would decrease total encounter time, without an increase in the rate of rereduction or surgery. METHODS: Patients with closed, isolated distal radius/distal ulna (DR/DU) or both bone forearm (BBFA) fractures that required sedation and reduction under mini C-arm fluoroscopy at our Level 1 pediatric ED were reviewed for 6 months both before and after this policy change. Before, all patients had formal postreduction radiographs; after, the decision was left to the orthopaedic physician. Timestamp data were collected, as was the need for rereduction or surgery. In addition to descriptive statistics, between-group differences were analyzed with the Student t test, χ test, and multivariable regression as appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 243 patients (119 before, 124 after) had 165 DR/DU and 78 BBFA fractures. Demographic data were similar before and after. After protocol implementation, univariable analysis (Student t test) showed that sedation times were longer, while total ED time and the time from sedation beginning to discharge were similar. The proportion of patients requiring rereduction or surgery were similar.After multivariable regression, "fluoroscopy as definitive imaging" was the only independent determinant of the time intervals compared with using conventional radiography. Sedation was an average of 13.8 minutes longer (P<0.001), while the interval from sedation beginning to discharge was 15.8 minutes shorter (P=0.007), and total ED time was 33.0 minutes shorter (P=0.018). Fluoroscopy as definitive imaging was not a predictor of surgery (odds ratio=0.63, P=0.520), although having a BBFA increased the likelihood (odds ratio=4.50, P=0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a protocol in which the provider could use mini C-arm fluoroscopy for definitive postreduction imaging did not result in increased rates remanipulation or need for surgery. Regression analysis further demonstrated time savings associated with foregoing conventional radiographs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-therapeutic.

A Novel Machine Learning Model Developed to Assist in Patient Selection for Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

INTRODUCTION: Patient selection for outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is important to optimizing patient outcomes. This study aims to develop a machine learning tool that may aid in patient selection for outpatient total should arthroplasty based on medical comorbidities and demographic factors. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective TSA from 2011 to 2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were queried. A random forest machine learning model was used to predict which patients had a length of stay of 1 day or less (short stay). A multivariable logistic regression was then used to identify which variables were significantly correlated with a short or long stay. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2016, 4,500 patients were identified as having undergone elective TSA and having the necessary predictive features and outcomes recorded. The machine learning model was able to successfully identify short stay patients, producing an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.77. The multivariate logistic regression identified numerous variables associated with a short stay including age less than 70 years and male sex as well as variables associated with a longer stay including diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class greater than 2. CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning may be used to predict which patients are suitable candidates for short stay or outpatient TSA based on their medical comorbidities and demographic profile.

Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Inpatients With Operative Distal Radius Fracture.

Acute carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) may occur concomitantly with distal radius fracture (DRF) and is often managed with carpal tunnel release (CTR). Carpal tunnel syndrome may also develop postoperatively after DRF fixation. The authors sought to determine the rate of CTS with DRF, prophylactic CTR, and postoperative development of CTS. Furthermore, they also sought to identify predictors of these. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database was queried (2002 to 2014) to identify adult inpatients undergoing surgical fixation of DRFs. They were segregated by the presence of CTS and further stratified by the timing of CTR in relation to DRF fixation. Those with a CTS diagnosis undergoing CTR on the same day as or prior to DRF fixation were classified as having CTS concomitantly. Patients undergoing CTR without a CTS diagnosis were considered prophylactically released. Carpal tunnel releases on any day after fracture fixation were considered complications. The authors identified 275,052 inpatients who had fixation of DRFs. Of these, 11,816 patients (4.3%) had CTS concomitantly. A total of 530 patients developed CTS after their DRF fixation (0.3%). Of those without CTS, 4420 patients (1.6%) underwent prophylactic CTR. Male sex, age younger than 50 years, and polytrauma status were associated with concomitant CTS and prophylactic CTR. Age younger than 50 years and polytrauma status were associated with postoperative development of CTS. The authors identified the rate of concomitant CTS, prophylactic CTR, and CTS developing postoperatively in inpatients undergoing DRF fixation. As early recognition and treatment optimizes outcomes after acute CTS, these data draw attention to the high rate of CTS and may be useful to surgeons treating patients with DRFs. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(4):227-234.].

Epidemiology of Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Injuries in Throwing Versus Contact Athletes of the National Collegiate Athletic Association: Analysis of the 2009-2010 to 2013-2014 Seasons.

BACKGROUND: The management and outcomes of elbow ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injuries in throwing athletes have been well investigated. However, less is known regarding the management, severity, and outcomes of such injuries in contact athletes. PURPOSE: To compare the incidence, severity, and outcomes of elbow UCL injuries between throwing and contact athletes in collegiate sports. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive epidemiology study. METHODS: Elbow UCL injuries were queried from the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Injury Surveillance Program between the seasons of 2009-2010 and 2013-2014 in 25 varsity sports. The rates and distribution of injuries by mechanism, participation restriction time, and outcomes (eg, season-ending injury, surgery) were examined. A severe injury was defined as loss of ≥21 days from participation, a season-ending injury, or requiring a surgical intervention. The injury frequency, incidence per 10,000 athlete-exposures (AEs), and injury proportion ratio comparing throwing and contact athletes were calculated with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Over the course of 5 seasons, 109 UCL injuries were recorded, for an overall injury rate of 0.29 per 10,000 AEs. Of these injuries, 83 (76.1%) were a result of contact and 26 (23.9%) from throwing. Men's wrestling (1.78 per 10,000 AEs) and men's baseball (1.12 per 10,000 AEs) sustained the highest injury rates. A larger proportion of throwing (n = 8; 36.4%) compared with contact (n = -7; 9.1%) (P < 0.01) injuries results in >21 days of time loss. Additionally, more throwing-related UCL injuries required surgery (n = 2; 11.1%) compared with contact-related injuries (n = 1; 1.3%) (P < 0.01). As a result, throwing athletes demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of severe injuries than contact athletes (injury proportion ratio, 4.62 [95% CI, 1.72-12.40]). CONCLUSION: The evaluation of athletes in 25 collegiate varsity sports across 5 seasons found over 3 times more elbow UCL injuries in contact versus throwing athletes. However, the number of severe injuries in throwing athletes was significantly higher than in contact athletes. These findings demonstrate that although elbow UCL injuries are prone to occur in both contact and throwing athletes, their prevention, management, and outcomes must be framed on a sport-by-sport basis.

Assessment of a Geriatric Hip Fracture Program: Analysis of Harmful Adverse Events Using the Global Trigger Tool.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of adding a geriatric comanagement program to the care of geriatric patients with a hip fracture at our hospital. The Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) Global Trigger Tool (GTT) was used to follow the frequency and severity of adverse events occurring in hospitalized patients and to examine the effectiveness of a comanagement program (the Geriatric Hip Fracture Program [GHFP]). METHODS: Data were collected for patients treated for a hip fracture from 2010 to 2014, which was 1 year prior to (October 2010 to September 2011) and 2 years after the implementation of the GHFP, and were grouped into 3-month intervals for analysis. The patients treated prior to the implementation of the GHFP were compared with those treated following the implementation of the program. The frequency and severity of adverse events were collected using the GTT. RESULTS: There were 75.9 patients with an adverse event and 160.7 adverse events per 100 admissions. After the institution of the GHFP, there was a significant decrease in the number of patients with adverse events and the number of adverse events per 100 admissions over time. The rate of adverse events decreased by 12% per year when acute blood loss anemia was excluded. Similarly, the number of adverse events (excluding blood loss anemia) decreased significantly over time, from 128.7 per 100 admissions before the GHFP to 34.2 in the last quarter. Multivariable analysis (excluding acute blood loss anemia) demonstrated a trend toward a decreased likelihood of a patient experiencing an adverse event after the institution of the GHFP as well as a trend toward a decrease in the number of adverse events per patient. The length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter after the implementation of the GHFP. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the GHFP reduced the number of adverse events over time. Increasing age and the Carlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were predictors of adverse events, while only age was a predictor of readmissions and CCI was a predictor of death in our study. The implementation of the GHFP has played an important role at our institution in quantifying the decrease in adverse events over a 2-year period, and we believe that it is essential for improving care of geriatric patients with a hip fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Efficacy and Cost-effectiveness of Topical Vancomycin Powder in Primary Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Topical vancomycin has been shown to effectively reduce infections after spinal surgery while remaining safe and cost-effective; however, there are few studies evaluating topical vancomycin in total hip arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that the incidence of periprosthetic joint infection would decrease with the use of topical vancomycin in total hip arthroplasty and that topical vancomycin would be cost-effective. A retrospective patient chart review was performed to evaluate consecutive primary cementless total hip arthroplasties performed in the authors' hospital system between April 2015 and December 2016. Demographic data were collected. Periprosthetic joint infection was defined by Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. Statistical analysis included t test, Fisher's exact test, and logistic regression. The costs of vancomycin and postoperative infection were used to determine the absolute risk reduction (1/number needed to treat) threshold needed for topical vancomycin to be cost-effective. In this study, 309 patients (55.7%) undergoing total hip arthroplasty were treated with topical vancomycin, and 246 patients (44.3%) did not receive treatment. There were 2 infections in the vancomycin group (0.6% incidence), and 4 in the no vancomycin group (1.6% incidence). There was no statistical difference in infection rate between the 2 cohorts (P=.414). The absolute risk reduction was 0.98%, and the number needed to treat with topical vancomycin was 102 patients to prevent 1 periprosthetic joint infection. Topical vancomycin ($12 per vial) resulted in an expected cost savings of $904 per patient. Topical vancomycin is inexpensive and cost-effective. Although not statistically significant, the topical vancomycin group had a 60% lower incidence of infection. Further research regarding appropriate prophylactic topical and intravenous antibiotic use is needed prior to widespread adoption. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(5):e430-e436.].

The Cost and Utility of Postreduction Radiographs After Closed Reduction of Pediatric Wrist and Forearm Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Formal radiographs are frequently obtained after reduction of closed pediatric wrist and forearm fracture performed under mini C-arm fluoroscopy. However, their utility has not been clearly demonstrated to justify the increased time, cost, and radiation exposure. We hypothesized that formal postreduction radiographs do not affect the rereduction rate of pediatric wrist and forearm fractures. We further sought to determine the time, monetary, and opportunity costs associated with obtaining these radiographs. METHODS: A total of 119 patients presented to our urban, level I pediatric trauma center from April 2015 to September 2015 with isolated, closed wrist and forearm fractures who underwent sedation and reduction using mini C-arm fluoroscopy. Demographic and injury variables were collected, along with incidence of rereduction and need for future surgery. Time intervals for sedation, awaiting x-ray, and total encounter periods were noted, and total direct and variable indirect costs for each encounter were obtained from our institution's cost accounting and billing databases. Marginal time and monetary costs were noted and further calculated as a percentage of the total encounter. Opportunity costs were calculated for the time spent obtaining the postreduction radiographs. RESULTS: Of 119 patients with isolated, closed wrist or forearm fractures, none required rereduction after initial reduction using sedation and mini C-arm fluoroscopy. Postreduction radiographs required an average of 26.2 minutes beyond the end of sedation, or 7.3% of the encounter time and cost. The direct cost of the x-ray was 2.6% of the encounter cost. With our institution's annual volume, this time could have been used to see an additional 656 patients per year. CONCLUSIONS: Postreduction formal radiographs did not result in changes in management. There are significant direct and opportunity costs for each patient who undergoes additional formal radiographs. Pediatric patients with isolated, closed wrist or forearm fractures do not routinely need formal radiographs after reduction under mini C-arm fluoroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Therapeutic.